“Vladimir Zabunov – 85 MT” 2014 AWARD |
(22.03.2014) Here is the Award of the Vladimir Zabunov - 85 MT 2014! The tourney was announced in 2013 which was the 85 anniversary year of Zabunov's birthday. I thank all participants and congratulate the awarded composers! Many thanks to the judge IGM Petko Petkov for his Award which is open for claims for next 30 days. “Vladimir Zabunov – 85 MT” 2014 AWARD
From the director of the tournament, Diyan Kostadinov, I've received 18 problems by 15 composers from 11 countries: No.1. Alberto Armeni (Italia), No.2.Kostas Prentos (Greece), No.3. Ricardo de Mattos Vieira (Brazil), No.4. Julia Vysotska (Latvia), No.5. Julia Vysotska (Latvia), No.6. Julia Vysotska (Latvia), No.7. Miodrag Mladenovic (Serbia), No.8. Velko Alexandrov (Bulgaria), No.9. Luis Miguel Martin (Spain), No.10. Franz Pachl (Germany), No.11. Franz Pachl and Ralf Kraetschmer (Germany), No.12. Mario Parrinello (Italy), No.13. Manfred Rittirsh (Germany), No.14. Ingemar Lind (Sweden), No.15. Ingemar Lind (Sweden), No.16. Kalyan Seetharaman (India), No.17.Michel Caillaud (France), No.18. Kjell Widlert (Sweden). The following of these compositions were not included: No.1 – too much forced and simple idea; No.6 - not thematical; No.8 - the w.Sc2 is superfluous in the second solution; No.15 - the scheme has an orthodox character well known from many #3; No.17 - probably, there is author's mistake as wRe2 is possible to exchange with a w.Pawn. The level of the competition is very high with many interesting problems. Not all of them show "Zabunov" theme in its pure, classic form ("Classic Zabunov"). Many problems show various modifications of the theme, many of them differ substantially from the classical "Zabunov canon". I have decided to include in ranking these compositions, that enrich and decorate this competition. A common thing between all of them and "Classic Zabunov" is the role of the forward battery-piece that transforms in a rear battery-piece in a new battery (direct or indirect). Three special prizes are awarded basing on an exceptional and unusual modernistic interpretation of the theme!
1-2 Prize: No.11. Franz Pachl and Ralf Kraetschmer (Germany) - A perfect realization of "Classic Zabunov" with maximal economy of white thematic pieces and active play of the both Kings. Black self-pins of the pieces B and S are an excellent additional motive! a) 1.Bf2-h4+ Kf7-e7 2.Rc4-e4+ Bh8-e5 3.Kg5-h6+ Qh3xh4#; b) 1.Rc4-g4+ Kf7-g7 2.Bf2-d4+ Sc6-e5 3.Kg5-h5+ Qh3xg4#. (C+, Py 4.65)
1-2 Prize: No.13. Manfred Rittirsh (Germany) - An important and quite substantial modification of the "Classic Zabunov": there's the 2nd reciprocal change of direct battery front/rear piece! In both solutions the remaining initial direct battery is fired as an indirect battery, battery cross-checks combined with fine white self-blocks (Bf3/Bc2). A superb using of the condition Anti-Circe! I.1…Qh8 2.Ke3 c3 3.Bf3+ Qxh3(Qd8)#; II. 1…Bd7 2.Kd3 Rd4 3.Bc2+ Bxh3(Bc8)#. (C+, Py 4.65) 3rd Prize: No.5. Julia Vysotska (Latvia) - An excellent Meredith without white Pawns! The only problem in this tournament with a use of Take&Make that works very good in each solution in 3 half-moves! Another additional motive to this nonstandard "Classic Zabunov" is the Annihilation of white R/Q. A minimal minus here seems the mating moves by black N. a) 1...Qc8xd7-e7+ 2.Nd5xe7-e8+ Kb5-a6 3.Qc7-e7+ Nb1xe7-c7#; b) 1...Qc8xc7-f4 2.Nd5xf4-f8+ Kb5-b6 3.Rd7-e7+ Nb1xe7-d7# (C+, Py 4.65) 4th Prize: No.9. Luis Miguel Martin (Spain) - A beautiful realization of the "Classic Zabunov" with a use of black Grasshoppper as forward piece in the initial black battery! Interesting play of two duos of thematic pieces Q/R with interchange of functions from both sides, despite the fact that the roles of the black Q and R are not quite identical in both solutions. I.1.Qe7-c7 Gg3-b8+ 2.Qc7-g3 Qe6-d7 3.Rf7-f6+ Rb6xf6#; II. 1.Rf7-g7 Gg3-g8+ 2.Rg7-g3 Rb6-a6 3.Qe7-f6+ Qe6xf6# (C+, Py 4.65)
5th Prize: No.16. K. Seetharaman (India) - As in Rittirsch's problem (but in more modest form), we see here a transformation of a white Rook-Lion/Queen battery into Queen/ Rook-Lion battery - with interchange of function between the forward and rear battery pieces! Good additional motives: anti-critical moves by Rg2, block of black NAg1/VAg1, inclusion of PAh2. The anti-dual tries Ng1?/VAg1 instituted by the author seems somewhat elementary. But this sympathetic problem composed only with 10 figures deserves a prize! I.1...Rg2-c2 2.RLf1-c1+ NAc3-g1! (VAg1?) 3.Qe1-e2+ Rc2xc1#; II. 1...Rg2-d2 2.RLf1-d1+ VAa7-g1! (NAg1?) 3.Qe1-f2+ Rd2xd1#. (C+, Py 4.65) Special Prize – No.7 Miodrag Mladenovic (Serbia) - Only one solution, but it demonstrates Zabunov theme two times with unusual switch from front to rear battery piece within the same battery! This excellent Meredith-Aristocrat with beautiful model mate finish indicates a very interesting, special way for the development of Zabunov theme! 1.Ge7-h4+ Gg7-e7 2.Gd7-d1+ Gf7-d7 3.Bg5-f4 + Sh7-f6 4.Rd2-c2+ Gd7-f7#. (C+, Py 4.65) Special Prize: No.4 . Julia Vysotska ( Latvia) - Initial white battery LE/R transforms into three new anti-batteries R/LE, where forward piece of initial battery (LE) becomes a rear piece of the new anti-battery R/LE in each solution! White Bristol R-R. Model mates. As always by this composer – a light form - Meredith! A small minus here is the symmetrical motives in the play, but these moments are organically connected with the scheme! I. 1.LEf7-f4+ Kc7-b8 2.Rg7-a7 LEc5-c1 3.Rh7-c7+ LEc1xf4 #; II. 1.LEf7-f5+ Kc7-c8 2.Rg7-b7 LEc5-c2 3.Rh7-d7+ LEc2xf5 #; III. 1.LEf7-f6 + Kc7-d8 2.Rg7-c7 LEc5-c3 3.Rh7-e7+ LEc3xf6 # (C+, Py 4.65)
Special Prize: No.18. Kjell Widlert (Sweden) - The only problem with thematic battery created with neutral pieces! A very special kind of Zabunov theme with the first battery directed towards the b.K, the second towards the wK. Both pieces in the second battery arrive by Anti-Circe transport. This wonderful concept is worthy of a prize despite the fact that b) solution seems richer in content! a) 1.nLEe6-e5 Bg4-h5 2.Rb6-g6 Sh4xg6[bSg6->g8] 3.nLEe5xh5[nLEh5->h8]+ Sg8-e7#; b) 1.nLEd6-d2 Sg4-h2 2.Ra6-h6 Bf4xh6[bBh6->f8] 3.nLEd2xh2[nLEh2->h8]+ Bf8-d6 #. Try: 1.nLEd7? Bh6 2.Re6 Bf8 3.nLExg4->g8+ Bd6+ 4.Kb7! (C+, Py 4.65) 1st Honourable Mention - No.12. Mario Parrinello (Italy) - Rather nonstandard and exotic demonstration of the theme, but in my opinion the fairy pieces are many and quite different in appearance here. This makes the implementation somewhat artificial and mechanical. a) 1.rCGa7-g7+ Rd5-d4 2.CGh8xd4 SIf4-f6+3.rCGg7-e5+ LEb6-b2#; b)1.rCGa7-g1+ Rd5-d1+ 2.CGh1xd1 SIf4-f1+ 3.rCGg1-e1+ LEb6-b1# (C+, Py 4.65) 2nd Honourable Mention – No.3. Ricardo de Mattos Viera (Brazil) - Here the initial thematic battery is indirect (Rb6/Ba7) - a modification of the "Classic Zabunov" that is quite acceptable, of course. The new white batteries are direct (Se5/Re6) and indirect (Bd5/Rd6) therefore we see here some thematic imbalance between both solutions. Very good are additional motives - black Grimshaw (c6) and white selfpins. But here the key-moves with non-thematic captures of the white Pawns are obviously not aesthetic. On this reason I think that this good scheme has not been developed optimally. I.1...Sg2xh4 2.Rb6-d6 Ra6-c6 3.Bd5-f3+ Sh4xf3#; II. 1...Sg2xf4 2.Rb6-e6 Ba8-c6 3.Se5-f3+ Sf4xe6#. (C+, Py 4.65)
3rd Honourable Mention – No.2. Kostas Prentos (Greece) - "Classic Zabunov" demonstrated with an interesting introduction - white Grimshaw on "b5". Unfortunately, there is no full thematic identity between the solutions. a) 1…Qg7 2.Bb5 Kh5 3.Bd3+ Kg6 4.Sd6+ Sxd3#; b) 1…Bg8 2.Rb5 Kf1 3.Re5+ Ke1 4.Sc5+ Se2#. (C+, Py 4.65) Commendation: No.10. Franz Pachl (Germany) - A very difficult and interesting thematical complex with transformations of both white batteries Ge4/Bg6 and Gd4/Rd7, combined with creation of new black batteries, G-blocks, white self-blocks etc. Unfortunately here we see a crude non-thematic capture 3.Kxg8 in solution a); a) 1...Nc2xd4 2.Ge4-h7+ Gb1-e4 3.Kf7xg8 Qc1-c2 4.Bg6-f7+ Ge4-e1#; b) 1...Nd2xe4 2.Gd4-d8+ Gd1-d4 3.Kf7-f8 Qc1-d2 4.Rd7-f7+ Gd4-a1#. (C+, Py 4.65) Commendation: No.14. Ingemar Lind (Sweden) - Another attempt to realize double Zabunov theme in only one solution. But it is obviously that this problem is far from the level of Mlademovic's Special prize. 1.Rh8-g8 Bg7xe5 2.Rg8xg4 Rc3-f3 3.Rg4xc4+ Rf3-f5 4.Sc5-e4+ Be5-c7# (C+, Py 4.65).
Judge: IGM PETKO PETKOV International judge of FIDE Sofia, 9th March 2014 |
KOBULCHESS.COM
site for chess composition
General editor:
Diyan Kostadinov
Co-editor:
Seetharaman Kalyan
Comments
(Diyan, there's one mistake in my diagram, 3rd Prize, should be Sa4 instead of Na4. The twin is correct.)
Congratulations to all participants!
In Manfred's 1/2 Prize, are the moves 1...Qh8 1...Bd7 considered firing (ie. move of the front piece) of an existing battery? Can anyone point out which is the front piece in this problem that moves to form the rear piece of a new battery (the Zabunov theme)?
In the initial position of Manfred's problem are two direct black batteries - Re4-Qe8 (where the Rook is front piece) and Pc4-Bb5 (bP as a front piece). These batteries transforms to other Q-R and B-P batteries where the Rook and Pawn becomes from front to rear battery pieces but in very paradoxical way - after play of the initial rear pieces!
Of course this differ from the classical form of Zabunov theme, but in the fairy genre these modifications (which we can see in some problems here) have proved very interesting and the judge decided to accept them.
Rear piece moving and forming a new battery is an easy method and is less interesting.
I dont see how it is related to Zabunov theme. I am disappointed that such an arbitrary change of theme is permissible and considered innovative. :(
I am happy that the problem shows only what I thought it did and that my initial understanding is correct!
"Zabunov theme" is shown only by K.Widlert clearly and perhaps by K.Prentos "indirectly". Other problems do not give a convincing reason for the existence of the 1st battery/antibattery. Mostly they show an illusory "Zabunov effect" which is actually used only as a tool for construction. Zabunov effect might be a proper name in case of help-play.
So actually, "Zabunov effect" was required for this tourney.
Some problems show the effect rather inconvincing if they show it at all.
M.Parinello shows antibattery check in W1 and no kind of battery is created after that.
R.de Mattos Viera shows a nice variety by creating direct/indirect batteries. But there's absolutely no need for the initial indirect white battery. wR is on b6 only to block bRa6. wBg1 would be just as good if bPa7 is added. wBa7 only saves one bP.
M.Mladenovic shows such exchange (front/rear) in a beautiful play but 2nd batteries are not automatically created by firing the 1st battery, they are created only after the next black move. Would it be a "delayed effect"? Also, wBg5 gives a completely artificial false impression of a battery. wPg5 would make a hurdle, a front battery piece and a selfblock, if bPf4 is added and the position rotated.
The problem shows more than you thought it did. Making the former front piece to a rear piece is clearly related to Zabunov theme. Here this is also achieved by the rear piece moving - that's the innovation. I would name it Para-Zabunov.
The initial batteries are even FIRED as indirect batteries in S2.
So for instance, the front piece fires a battery giving a flight and mates in another move - isn't that a Siers battery?
W: Re7,Se6,Kg6,Bd2; B: Pc4,Ke4,Bc3; h#1,5
1...Sf4+ 2.Kd4 Be3#
1...Rd7 2.Be5 Sg5#
Zabunov is a creation of a new battery by utilizing the efects/power of an old battery.
Without such a relation between the two batteries, the essence is lost.
A walk on a rope stretched high between the skyscrapers could be imitated by a clown on the firm ground.
It could be fun and also acrobatic but we know that the clown's movement is fake and not caused by keeping the balance on a high thin rope.
Teasing a teddy bear is not as brave as teasing a living grizzly bear.
Well, I see a CRUCIAL DIFFERENCE.
I do not see the firm ground here, and I am not joking. The essence are the muscles, so please don't tease the bear just because it's white. It dives.
I'm sorry, it's all so simple that it can't be explained. You just see it or not.
Despite its general quality, your problem may be related to "Zabunov" only as a nice non-thematic example to illustrate what is not "Zabunov".
The very announcement of this tourney is missing the essence of "Zabunov".
But even that announcement says:
"..the FRONT piece from one battery MAKES an AMBUSH MOVE..etc."
The judge had a choice to reject some of the best problems as not thematic or to accept them as partially thematic but very interesting and important for the general concept of batteries, apart from "Zabunov".
His choice is evidently a proper one.
I just think that these problems deserve a distinctive thematic definition of the type of battery-transformation, along with a name of the theme (which doesn't show the true essence of "Zabunov").
Who can tell what's the "true" essence of something?
What if I think that the switch from front to rear is the essence of Zabunov? Would this be the "false" essence?
Why restrict the meaning of "move" in the Zabunov definition to chess laws? If - from a relativistic point of view - the whole board excluding the rear piece, but including the front piece is moving, the front piece was moved.
Is a paracritical move a critical move?
How can you be so sure about meaning?
What's the goal of a theme tourney?
Read Wittgenstein (and comment #14 for the name of the rose)!
Of course, you may claim that anything is "Zabunov", IF you provide at least your definition of your concept.
Piece makes a move by moving on the board. Believe it or not, "on the board" means "relatively to the board" and not "along with the board".
Relativistic point of view sees the REAR piece moving relatively to the board in both cases.
And that's the very essence of relativity:
the relation.
But that is the trouble about computing: it requires a correct input. And the input requires thinking, which means recognizing the essential relevance.
"Making a move" is a relation between a piece and the board, and not between two pieces.
RSS feed for comments to this post