<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>The 2nd Israel Open Chess Problem Composition Tourney 2014</title>
		<description>Discuss The 2nd Israel Open Chess Problem Composition Tourney 2014</description>
		<link>http://kobulchess.com/en/tournaments/announcements/417-israel-open-chess-problem-composition-tourney.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 10:05:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://kobulchess.com/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/417/10.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Vitaly Medintsev says:</title>
			<link>http://kobulchess.com/en/tournaments/announcements/417-israel-open-chess-problem-composition-tourney.html#comment-794</link>
			<description><![CDATA[:-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Vitaly Medintsev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2013 08:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://kobulchess.com/en/tournaments/announcements/417-israel-open-chess-problem-composition-tourney.html#comment-794</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nikola Predrag says:</title>
			<link>http://kobulchess.com/en/tournaments/announcements/417-israel-open-chess-problem-composition-tourney.html#comment-793</link>
			<description><![CDATA[There are interpretations that piece which plays the mating move - mates, even if it does not check. This looks strange but not necessarily wrong. Check is only the attack on the King, but that's not enough for the mate. The most essential for the mate is to make sure that check can't be parried. Several pieces and factors participate in the mate, but the ultimate CAUSE of the mate is the last move by the particular piece. Of course, speculating may be interesting but the firm definitions would be more helpful :-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nikola Predrag</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2013 03:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://kobulchess.com/en/tournaments/announcements/417-israel-open-chess-problem-composition-tourney.html#comment-793</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Vitaly Medintsev says:</title>
			<link>http://kobulchess.com/en/tournaments/announcements/417-israel-open-chess-problem-composition-tourney.html#comment-791</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ ...which mates...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Vitaly Medintsev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 20:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://kobulchess.com/en/tournaments/announcements/417-israel-open-chess-problem-composition-tourney.html#comment-791</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nikola Predrag says:</title>
			<link>http://kobulchess.com/en/tournaments/announcements/417-israel-open-chess-problem-composition-tourney.html#comment-790</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Mate by switchback is presented in that example. It's obvious that it doesn't matter which piece(s) checks.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nikola Predrag</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 14:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://kobulchess.com/en/tournaments/announcements/417-israel-open-chess-problem-composition-tourney.html#comment-790</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Vitaly Medintsev says:</title>
			<link>http://kobulchess.com/en/tournaments/announcements/417-israel-open-chess-problem-composition-tourney.html#comment-789</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think the second example in section 2 is non-thematic sinсe both white pieces give mate by double check.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Vitaly Medintsev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 09:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://kobulchess.com/en/tournaments/announcements/417-israel-open-chess-problem-composition-tourney.html#comment-789</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
