<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Originals - June 2012 (Part 2)</title>
		<description>Discuss Originals - June 2012 (Part 2)</description>
		<link>http://kobulchess.com/en/problems/originals2012/116-kobulchess-originals-june-2.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 16:42:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://kobulchess.com/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/116/10.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>dkostadinov says:</title>
			<link>http://kobulchess.com/en/problems/originals2012/116-kobulchess-originals-june-2.html#comment-169</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thank you Nikola for your nice version of n.36! Yes, with twin form some weaknesses are possible to be avoided.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dkostadinov</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 14:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://kobulchess.com/en/problems/originals2012/116-kobulchess-originals-june-2.html#comment-169</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nikola Predrag says:</title>
			<link>http://kobulchess.com/en/problems/originals2012/116-kobulchess-originals-june-2.html#comment-168</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A rough scheme with bR and a twin: White Pg7 Kf5 Black Re8 Ph6 Pd5 Kh5 Pg4 Ph4 Pb3 Pc3 Pd2 Twin Move d5 e4]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nikola Predrag</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 20:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://kobulchess.com/en/problems/originals2012/116-kobulchess-originals-june-2.html#comment-168</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dkostadinov says:</title>
			<link>http://kobulchess.com/en/problems/originals2012/116-kobulchess-originals-june-2.html#comment-167</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello Nikola and wellcome in KoBulChess comments! Yes, you are right that in problem n.36 in one phase bRe4 is just cookstopper and this is weakness, but we still can not find the improvement for that. The best will be if it is possible pawns only position, but is it possible? Will be very nice.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dkostadinov</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 19:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://kobulchess.com/en/problems/originals2012/116-kobulchess-originals-june-2.html#comment-167</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nikola Predrag says:</title>
			<link>http://kobulchess.com/en/problems/originals2012/116-kobulchess-originals-june-2.html#comment-166</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In No.36 bRe4 guards 1 square in one phase but it's only a cookstopper in the other. Could it be improved or would be better some twinning which makes bR participate in the mate in both phases?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nikola Predrag</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 15:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://kobulchess.com/en/problems/originals2012/116-kobulchess-originals-june-2.html#comment-166</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dkostadinov says:</title>
			<link>http://kobulchess.com/en/problems/originals2012/116-kobulchess-originals-june-2.html#comment-159</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Problems 39 and 41 are partially tested only, so the solvers may enjoy to look them more deep.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dkostadinov</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://kobulchess.com/en/problems/originals2012/116-kobulchess-originals-june-2.html#comment-159</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
